gfxgfx
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfxgfx
 
 
gfx gfx
gfx
7155 Posts in 927 Topics by 28 Members - Latest Member: Dog Star 19 May 2024, 03:29:50 pm
*
gfx* Home | Help | Search | Calendar | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
Forlorn Hope  |  The Attic  |  General World of Warcraft Discussion (Moderators: JohnO, icemaiden, Hercule)  |  Topic: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?  (Read 2066 times)

brodski

  • Proconsul
  • *******
  • Posts: 147
  • Karma: +0/-0
Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« on: 16 May 2008, 12:03:35 pm »
I’m currently working on levelling my first main character (windgard, dwarf hunter, lvl 48 at time of posting), and all I seem to be picking up at the moment are Dungeon quests, so does anyone have a high 40’s or low 50’s alt and fancy joining up to go through the sunken temple or Zul'Farrak? (or both)?

If so, when are people interested in going

You know you want to…

Sandmann

  • WoW Officer
  • Proconsul
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #1 on: 16 May 2008, 01:03:27 pm »
I could probably add a warlock and a mage to that mix. Meanas needs Sunken Temple. Around this weekend - but not Saturday night. I'll check with my better half as I think we were gnoming this evening.
Never trust a Tribble...

Twylyte

  • Guest
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #2 on: 16 May 2008, 01:51:24 pm »
Dipcots in - I have the same quests
(He's a Mage)

MArk

brodski

  • Proconsul
  • *******
  • Posts: 147
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #3 on: 16 May 2008, 02:06:38 pm »
Cool, I'm not around much on saturday, but should be about sunday afternoon/evening-  if that's good for people.
If not we could try for a evening slot in the week.


Sandmann

  • WoW Officer
  • Proconsul
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #4 on: 27 May 2008, 01:03:36 pm »
I have just looked at my lock (54) and my shammy's (44) gear and it is a pitiful sight to behold. Anyone with alts around the same level that could do with a few lower level instance runs?

Never trust a Tribble...

Sandmann

  • WoW Officer
  • Proconsul
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #5 on: 22 August 2008, 01:41:58 pm »
Anyone fancy a trip to BRD at some point soon? Happy to pug it with my shammy but was wondering if anyone else fancied a go.
Never trust a Tribble...

brodski

  • Proconsul
  • *******
  • Posts: 147
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #6 on: 22 August 2008, 05:10:10 pm »
Anyone fancy a trip to BRD at some point soon? Happy to pug it with my shammy but was wondering if anyone else fancied a go.

I want to take Windgard there to pick up the XL jumper cables recipe, I was having a little luck soloing it a few weeks ago, until I got cocky and managed to aggro far, far to many packs of mobs at once, if your shammy has be a healer we may be able to duo it, but more people will always be better.

Sandmann

  • WoW Officer
  • Proconsul
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #7 on: 22 August 2008, 09:05:16 pm »
Denul is enh spec to level - but I healed Sunken temple the other day and have healer gear.
Never trust a Tribble...

Prythos

  • Proconsul
  • *******
  • Posts: 182
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
« Reply #8 on: 3 September 2008, 09:37:55 pm »
I could probably add a warlock and a mage to that mix. Meanas needs Sunken Temple. Around this weekend - but not Saturday night. I'll check with my better half as I think we were gnoming this evening.

Damn.
I must get myself a partner,
I wanna go gnoming too :(

Forlorn Hope  |  The Attic  |  General World of Warcraft Discussion (Moderators: JohnO, icemaiden, Hercule)  |  Topic: Anyone fancy a low(er) level instance?
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!